SynthesisBMC public health2026
Implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health: an umbrella review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare guidelines are intended to standardize health practitioners' practice and improve patient outcomes, yet their implementation in public health is often inconsistent. This umbrella review aimed to identify barriers and facilitators influencing guideline implementation and to provide an overview of effective strategies to enhance guideline adherence in public health.
methodsSystematic reviews and meta-analyses, published between 2014 and 2024, were identified through searches in PubMed (Q4 2024) and Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database (Q2 2026). After applying the inclusion criteria, these were assessed for methodological quality using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Barriers, facilitators, and strategies were categorized using the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI) framework to provide a comprehensive overview.
resultsThirteen systematic reviews were included, most of which conducted qualitative syntheses, with only one meta-analysis identified. Organizational determinants were the most frequently reported barriers, including limited resources, insufficient coordination, and lack of management support. Factors related to healthcare professionals, such as perceived relevance of guidelines and alignment with practice, also influenced implementation. Facilitators included perceived usefulness of guidelines, professional engagement, and social support. A wide range of implementation strategies was identified, targeting organizational structures, end-users, and guideline characteristics. Educational approaches were the most applied but showed inconsistent effectiveness, especially when used in isolation. Evidence on the added value of multi-component strategies was mixed, with no single approach consistently associated with successful implementation.
conclusionEffective implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health requires a comprehensive approach addressing context-specific determinants. Although implementation challenges are shared across healthcare, the structural characteristics of public health often amplify organizational and end-user barriers. No single strategy ensures consistent success; instead, effectiveness depends on tailoring implementation efforts to specific settings and determinants. Further high-quality research is needed to identify effective implementation strategies and bridge the gap between evidence and daily public health practice. REGISTRATION: This umbrella review was not registered in a publicly accessible database prior to its conduct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.