SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Prognostic value of controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with peripheral artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) prognostic value in peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients through a meta-analysis.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to November 2024. Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), amputation, and poor ulcer healing were extracted. Data were synthesized using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analysis assessed result stability and heterogeneity sources. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.1.
resultsFifteen cohort studies with 6,830 PAD patients were included. Higher CONUT scores were linked to increased mortality (12 studies, HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.21-1.49) and amputation risk (6 studies, OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.10-1.32), while higher PNI was associated with reduced mortality (3 studies, HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97) and amputation risk (2 studies, OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.87-0.95). No significant link was found between CONUT and MACE or poor ulcer healing. Sensitivity analysis revealed instability in the association between CONUT and poor ulcer healing.
conclusionsCONUT and PNI could predict mortality and amputation risk in PAD patients, aiding early identification of high-risk individuals. Due to the study's retrospective design and potential instability, further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.