Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2026
Airway coach project: development of a machine learning-based model using clinical and ultrasound parameters to support videolaryngoscopy strategy.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06925009 (Airway Coach Project), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Airway Coach Project: Prediction of Videolaryngoscopy Strategy With Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters (Unicentric)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideolaryngoscopy (VL) is recommended as a first-line technique for tracheal intubation; however, existing airway assessment tools-largely derived from direct laryngoscopy-provide limited guidance for videolaryngoscopy-specific decisions such as blade selection or anticipated adjunct use. Point-of-care airway ultrasound offers additional anatomical information that may complement conventional clinical assessment. Multimodal approaches integrating clinical and ultrasound-derived variables may improve pre-procedural videolaryngoscopy planning.
methodsIn this single-centre prospective observational study, 250 adults (ASA physical status I-III) undergoing elective surgery were assessed preoperatively using clinical variables and point-of-care airway ultrasound. Videolaryngoscopic intubation was initiated with a Macintosh-type blade and prospectively classified according to procedural performance: Grade 0 (Macintosh blade without adjuncts), Grade 1 (Macintosh blade requiring adjuncts), and Grade 2 (need to switch to a hyperangulated device). A supervised machine-learning approach was used to develop a multiclass classification model integrating clinical and ultrasound-derived variables, using stratified cross-validation on a training dataset and evaluation on an independent test set.
resultsIn the independent test set, a gradient boosting model demonstrated good discriminative performance for videolaryngoscopy strategy classification (AUC 0.95; accuracy 92%). Performance varied across outcome categories, with lower F1-scores in the less frequent classes (F1-score 0.75 for Grade 1 and 0.67 for Grade 2). Classification was driven by a combination of tongue-related ultrasound parameters, anterior neck soft-tissue distances, body-mass index, and age.
conclusionsIn this single-centre observational study, a machine learning-based model integrating clinical and airway ultrasound variables was developed to support videolaryngoscopy strategy planning. By targeting a functional, videolaryngoscopy-specific outcome that reflects procedural performance rather than glottic view alone, this multimodal, data-driven approach demonstrates feasibility and warrants further evaluation in independent populations before clinical implementation.
trial registrationThis study was registered at Clinical Trial.gov NCT06925009.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.