ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Physical activity for small- and medium-sized enterprises: what features work in real life? A Delphi study.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regular physical activity is essential for preventing noncommunicable diseases and benefits both employees and organizations. Although small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) employ most of the European workforce, they are often underrepresented in research on workplace health promotion. Most existing evidence from initiatives to promote health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) focuses on large organizations and lacks insights into feasibility within SMEs. This study aimed to identify real-life HEPA initiatives perceived as most feasible for SMEs and to explore expert consensus on transferable features. We conducted a three-stage hybrid e-Delphi study including a grey literature review, an expert survey, and expert panel discussions, integrating both quantitative scoring and qualitative discussion. Experts independently rated the feasibility of workplace HEPA initiatives and participated in moderated sessions to interpret the findings and identify transferable elements. A total of 714 real-life HEPA initiatives were identified and categorized according to behaviour and intensity. Of these, 390 were evaluated by 17 international experts using predefined criteria, including feasibility by company size. No initiative-level consensus was reached across the WHO European Region. Panellists identified transferable features (most frequently in active-living and exercise/fitness domains) and emphasized adaptability, low-threshold approaches and enterprise size as an indicator. This study contributes a structured analysis of feasible workplace HEPA initiatives for SMEs, using a Delphi-based consensus process. The findings provide guidance for developing practical tools tailored to the needs and capacities of SMEs in the European context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.