ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep residual networks for short-term load forecasting: an empirical study on the impact of network depth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of network depth on the performance of deep residual networks (DRNs) for short-term load forecasting (STLF) remains insufficiently understood. This study conducts a systematic empirical investigation of network depth within DRN-based frameworks, with a particular focus on its relationship with forecasting performance, model behavior, and dataset characteristics. Two representative models, namely the original DRN and the Principal Component Analysis-Deep Residual Network (PCA-DRN), are evaluated under a wide range of depth configurations using two real-world datasets with different load and meteorological characteristics: ISO-NE and MyPJ. The results suggest that the influence of network depth on forecasting performance is inherently nonlinear and highly dataset-dependent. For the ISO-NE dataset, medium-depth configurations achieve favorable performance by effectively modeling more pronounced seasonal variability and long-term temporal patterns. In contrast, relatively shallow configurations generally exhibit improved performance on the MyPJ dataset under the current experimental setting, suggesting that deeper architectures may introduce additional model complexity without consistent performance gains. Furthermore, within the MyPJ dataset containing multiple meteorological variables, the incorporation of PCA improves feature representation, enhances model robustness, and is associated with reduced sensitivity to depth variations under the current experimental setting. Comparative evaluations against mainstream deep learning (DL) models indicate that DRN-based frameworks achieve competitive forecasting performance with relatively efficient structural designs. In addition, bootstrap-based statistical analysis suggests that the observed performance differences remain distinguishable under sample-level variability within the current experimental setting. These findings suggest that appropriate network depth selection should be considered together with dataset characteristics and feature representation, providing practical insights for the design of efficient and robust STLF models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.