ArticleScientific reports2026
Approaching background sounds extend the duration of foreground auditory stimuli.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time estimation is crucial to deal with external objects, either for their timely avoidance or interaction. Studies on the effect of approaching sounds on time estimation reported that these stimuli produce time overestimations, generally interpreted as an acceleration of the internal clock due to the attention/arousal prompted by potential approaching objects. Yet, in these studies the moving sounds were also the targets of time estimations, potentially generating confounds. Here we investigated the effect of background moving sounds on the perceived duration of separate foreground stimuli. Moreover, we provided an explicit computational model illustrating how changes in background moving sounds affect time estimation. Three groups of blindfolded participants passively listened to (background) approaching, receding, or scrambled (control) motion sounds, which were rendered using sensory substitution. Meanwhile, participants were presented with sinewave tones of different durations, which were estimated by participants using the reproduction method. The group exposed to the approaching background sound significantly overestimated the duration of the tones. This suggests that even background moving sounds can elicit the attentional/perceptual mechanism responsible for accelerating the internal clock. Moreover, shorter tones tended to be overestimated, and longer ones underestimated (Vierordt effect), indicating Bayesian regression toward the mean duration, which was successfully captured by our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.