Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315880›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Continuous predictive mortality risk monitoring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Nick Rucks, Sergej Korlakov, Sebastian Alexander Scharf, Anna Rommerskirchen, Rainer Haas, Stefan Conrad

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nick Rucks *Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. nick.rucks@hhu.de.
Sergej Korlakov *Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. sergej.korlakov@hhu.de.
Sebastian Alexander ScharfInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anna RommerskirchenInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rainer HaasDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefan ConradDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains critical for treating high-risk hematological malignancies like leukemia. Despite advances in treatment, early mortality remains clinically significant, with approximately 6-11% of patients dying within the first 100 days after transplantation. This highlights the need for dynamic monitoring strategies beyond static pre-transplant risk assessments. This study introduces a novel, interpretable, real-time proof-of-concept monitoring framework that continuously assesses individualized mortality risk during treatment using routinely collected clinical data. The framework employs deep learning models to predict seven-day mortality risk based on 22 laboratory parameters from the previous 14 days and five demographic features. The framework incorporates an explainability method that provides time-resolved insights into predictions, which can be aggregated across time intervals or patient groups for broader interpretation. We evaluated the approach on data from 891 patients treated at the University Hospital of Düsseldorf (UKD; 2004-2019), as well as on an independent cohort derived from the MIMIC-IV database. Our experiments demonstrate that the predicted mortality risk aligns with observed outcomes, achieving a patient-level AUROC of 0.95 in the primary (UKD) cohort. Preliminary expert evaluation suggests that the predictions and explanations are intuitive and clinically relevant, supporting awareness of complications and highlighting potential for timely intervention.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPredictive Learning ModelsAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsProof of Concept StudyRisk AssessmentTransplantation, HomologousAI in oncologyAllogeneic stem cell transplantationArtificial intelligenceClinical decision support systemsExplainable AI (XAI)Prognostic and health management(Remote) Patient monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42315880
PMCPMC13280382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.