ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
Denoising of 4D dynamic PET images using spatiotemporal regularization with integrated temporal restoration (SPRINTER).
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHigh-quality 4D dynamic PET imaging is often compromised by noise, especially in low-count frames, which limits clinical utility and quantitative accuracy. This study proposes a novel spatiotemporal denoising method (SPRINTER) that integrates anatomical priors, self-supervised adaptive principal component analysis (aPCA), and deep learning to enhance image quality and preserve time activity fidelity without relying on ground-truth data.
methodsThe method combines anatomically guided aPCA-based temporal smoothing with a supervised 3D ResUNet for spatial denoising. The resulting high signal-to-noise ratio, spatially denoised images are iteratively refined using a temporal regularization strategy to enhance contrast. The model was trained using brain scan datasets from 220 participants who were administered one of the following PET/MRI radiotracers:
resultsWe compared SPRINTER with OSEM, spatial-only, temporal-only, and two existing unsupervised denoising approaches, including NLM and Noise2Void. Across both simulation and acquired datasets, SPRINTER significantly outperformed all comparison methods (p < 0.05, ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison corrections). The largest gains were observed for the noisiest data using
conclusionThis study introduces a robust, self-supervised spatiotemporal denoising method for 4D dynamic PET imaging of the brain. SPRINTER spatiotemporal denoising leverages anatomical guidance and temporal dynamics to enhance spatial clarity and temporal consistency. Its radiotracer-agnostic design and rigorous self-supervision make it well-suited for clinical applications where high-quality reference data are unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.