Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315797›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Fronto-Parietal EEG asymmetry interactions predict negative attention bias: A secondary data analysis.

Hallvard Solbø Hagen, Sandra Klonteig, Jan Ivar Røssberg, Rune Jonassen, Nils Inge Landrø, Ragnhild Bø

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hallvard Solbø HagenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvannveien 21, 0372, Oslo, Norway. h.s.hagen@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1004-4723
Sandra KlonteigFaculty of Technology, Art, and Design, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Ivar RøssbergInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvannveien 21, 0372, Oslo, Norway.
Rune JonassenFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Nils Inge LandrøClinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild BøClinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 229135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention bias (AB), the excessive attentional selection of certain stimuli over others, is found in individuals suffering from depression. Similarly, alpha asymmetries, the lateralization of inhibitory cortical activity in the EEG alpha band (8-13 Hz) have been linked to depression and motivational direction. By contrasting novel and more reliable AB metrics against alpha asymmetries in an exploratory data analysis, we aimed to examine whether hemispheric differences are associated with AB scores, which could in turn refine the current model of AB metrics. Fifty nonclinical females, aged 18-30 years with minimal-to-moderate depressive symptoms were included. The participants performed two sessions of the dot-probe task, measuring AB, consisting of 160 trials each. Primary and ratio AB scores were calculated by using the novel response-based calculations. Furthermore, resting-state 32-channel EEG was measured for 2.5 min. Alpha asymmetry scores were calculated for frontal (F3/F4, F7/F8) and parietal electrode pairs (P3/P4, P7/P8). Correlations and interactions were analyzed. The primary AB scores were positively associated with frontal asymmetries, whereas parietal asymmetries showed negative associations. The ratio AB scores also showed regional differences. Parietal asymmetries interacted significantly with frontal asymmetries and AB. There was a moderate positive correlation between the BDI-II scores and the bias ratio. Our results suggest that alpha asymmetries contribute to individual differences in attention bias, with frontoparietal asymmetry interactions playing a notable role. These findings highlight hemispheric asymmetries as important to consider in future models of attention bias. Nonetheless, the associations are preliminary and call for replication.

Indexed as

Alpha asymmetryAttention biasElectroencephalogram

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.