ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Practices in prehabilitation and follow-up after hernia surgery: a global survey of 135 surgeons from 20 countries.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite being one of the most common procedures worldwide, with over 20 million cases annually, hernia repair overall continues to pose persistent challenges to clinicians. Challenges such as recurrence, chronic pain, and surgical site infections. Aside from surgical technique, preoperative optimization and postoperative follow-up can influence patient outcomes. However, practices vary widely and are influenced by practice type and patient-level barriers.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of practicing surgeons worldwide through Facebook hernia and abdominal wall surgery groups. The anonymous survey assessed existing prehabilitation programs, follow-up, and perceived limitations to optimal care.
resultsA total of 145 surgeons from 22 countries participated. Of these, 58% were abdominal wall and hernia specialists and 44% practiced in dedicated hernia centers. Overall, 74% routinely recommended prehabilitation and 66% did so for all patients. The most common components were weight loss, smoking cessation, and glycemic control. Surgeons in hernia centers were more likely to recommend smoking cessation (p = 0.005), diabetes control (p = 0.04), and exercise (p = 0.03). Specialists more frequently recommended prehabilitation in more than 75% of ventral hernia cases (p = 0.001) and atypical hernias (p < 0.001). Hernia society membership was the only independent predictor of routine prehabilitation recommendation (OR 6.30; 95% CI 1.56-29.58; p = 0.01). Regarding postoperative follow up, 50% reported a standardized protocol for all hernias and 30% for high risk or complex cases only. Follow up was primarily in-person 77%. Hernia centers more frequently reported longer term follow up of 1-5 years for inguinal (p = 0.02), umbilical (p = 0.03), and non-complex ventral hernias (p < 0.001), as well as life-long follow up across hernia types. Abdominal wall and hernia specialty was independently associated with standardized follow-up protocols (OR 4.74; 95% CI 1.36-18.1; p = 0.017).
conclusionPrehabilitation and follow-up remain heterogeneous with adherence limited by the combination of patient, surgeon, and system-level barriers. Differences in practices between high- and low-volume surgeons suggest opportunities for society-driven guidance, extending standardized protocols, and deploying adherence tools to improve consistency and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42315780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.