ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Similar experiences can enhance or impair existing memories or newly encoded events. Such retroactive and proactive memory effects have been examined using A-B, A-D tasks in which pairs studied across two lists share cues but have changed responses. These tasks often show greater retroactive interference on immediate than delayed tests and greater proactive interference on delayed than immediate tests. Four experiments using A-B, A-D tasks characterized the role of change awareness in such effects. Retroactive interference from List 2 onto List 1 recall was observed on immediate but not delayed tests. When List 2 included measures of change awareness and List 1 recall, retroactive facilitation in List 1 recall was observed on a delayed test. Conversely, intrusions from List 1 onto List 2 recall, indicating proactive interference, were greater on delayed than immediate tests. Response interdependence on the final test showed that correct recall was associated with recollection of other list responses and that changes had occurred. These findings indicate that retrieval practice during List 2 both increased accessibility of earlier responses and promoted cross-episode integration. When the retrieved response was later the target, this accessibility produced retroactive facilitation; when it was the competitor, it increased proactive interference unless recollection of change preserved information about the responses' temporal relationship. The theoretical implications are that temporal changes in retroactive and proactive interference depend not only on differences in trace accessibility across lists but also on whether study-phase retrieval promotes integrative encoding and whether change information remains accessible at test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42315774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.