ArticleHealth economics review2026
Formal and informal financial inclusion and its impact on health: empirical evidence from South Africa.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ability to secure high quality healthcare and access at an affordable cost for the entire population is the principal health objective of many countries on the path to the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study addresses the critical, yet understudied, impact of formal and informal financial inclusion on health, directly supporting the objectives of SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being).
methodsThe study employs and modifies South Africa's National Income Dynamic Study microdata by combining all five waves to create panel data. A random effects ordered probit model is used since it is possibly the best approach for panel data on self-rated health outcomes as it takes into consideration the existence of an additional normally distributed cross-section error term which captures individual specific effects.
resultsResults for formal financial inclusion dummy variable are statistically significant and positive, suggesting that individuals with access to formal financial services such as savings and credit have a higher probability of reporting better health outcomes. However, results for informal financial inclusion dummy variable are statistically significant and negative, implying that higher reliance on informal finance like stokvel savings and mashonisa credit shifts individuals toward the lower outcomes of health.
conclusionGiven the mixed outcomes of the impact of formal and informal financial inclusion on health, this study recommends policies that could integrate informal savings and credit into the formal digital economy and address structural barriers that limit the effectiveness and efficiency of the financial system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.