Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315760›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2026

Current status and challenges of TCR-T cell therapy for AML/MDS.

Yoshiki Akatsuka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yoshiki AkatsukaDepartment of Immunology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Japan. yos-akatsuk@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-2826

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP23ek0510042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although novel drugs have recently been introduced in the clinic, the survival rates of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are not yet satisfactory; thus, developing novel strategies with different modes of action is urgently needed. Immunotherapy against AML/MDS is less feasible than that for B-cell malignancies because commonly and uniformly expressed cell-surface targets are lacking, and HLA constraints further limit patient eligibility. Careful patient selection based on high and homogeneous target antigen expression in AML/MDS cells may serve as a biomarker. In this review, we first describe T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell therapy development processes, then review recent clinical trials and future perspectives.

Indexed as

Adoptive therapyAMLGene-modified T-cellMDSTCR-T

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.