ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of chemical treatment on the mechanical and thermal performance of flax fiber reinforced aluminium 6082 laminate: a machine learning-enhanced investigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work examined the role of alkaline and epoxy-based surface chemical treatments on the mechanical and thermal properties of flax fiber reinforced Aluminum Alloy 6082 hybrid Fiber Metal Laminates (FMLs), integrated with machine learning (ML) predictive frameworks. Flax fiber mats underwent surface modification via a 1% NaOH alkaline soak followed by an epoxy sizing treatment to promote stronger bonding with the aluminum matrix. Concurrently, aluminum sheets were treated with an NaOH-Na₂CO₃ alkaline bath to enhance metal-polymer interfacial compatibility. Composite laminates were manufactured through hand layup combined with compression molding at 30 bar and 70 °C curing for four hours. Tensile characterization followed ASTM D638 protocols, thermal conductivity measurements employed a guarded hot plate (GHP) system per ASTM C177, and corrosion evaluation relied on gravimetric immersion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl over 30 days. Predictive models using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest (RF) were developed on a structured 180-observation experimental dataset. Steady-state thermal conductivity values of 0.1039 W/m·K and 0.065 W/m·K were recorded for untreated and chemically treated FFAL laminates, respectively. Surface treatment yielded a 31% gain in tensile strength (168.5 MPa to 220.7 MPa) and a 34% rise in tensile modulus (12.3 GPa to 16.34 GPa), while thermal conductivity declined by 37.4%. Among all models, the Random Forest algorithm demonstrated superior predictive capability with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.