ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based RUL and SOH prediction of lithium-ion batteries using LOCO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degradation in lithium-ion batteries negatively affects the reliability, safety, and cost-effectiveness of modern energy storage systems, making accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction and State of Health (SOH) assessment essential for battery prognostics. In this work, a comprehensive comparative benchmarking framework for battery prognostics is presented using three representative deep learning architectures, namely, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), and Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT). To provide a fair and reproducible comparison between models and datasets, identical preprocessing, feature engineering, normalization, and training procedures are applied to two publicly available benchmark datasets, namely, the NASA Ames Battery Aging Dataset and the Oxford Battery Degradation Dataset. Using a sliding-window approach, degradation-related features and temporal statistical descriptors are organized as time-series sequences capable of capturing nonlinear degradation behavior. To make a realistic assessment of cross-cell generalization, a strict Leave-One-Cell-Out (LOCO) validation protocol is used, where the models are validated on completely new battery cells. The prediction task is defined as a regression problem for RUL prediction, and the SOH based on the normalized discharge capacity is used to analyze the degradation behavior. Model performance is evaluated by Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) and is expressed as mean ± SD standard deviations across repeated random seeds. We differentiate stochastic training effects from variations caused by different LOCO folds by additional statistical analysis with confidence interval estimation, seed-level variability, and evaluation on cell level. The results show that the degradation complexity and cross-cell heterogeneity affect the model performance, which highlights the importance of carefully designed evaluation protocols, statistical reliability analysis, and rigorous cross-cell validation to ensure reliable model benchmarking in lithium-ion batteries' prognostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.