ArticleScientific reports2026
Uropathogenic profiles and antibiotic resistance in gynecological cases: a microbial surveillance study from Northeast India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections affecting women worldwide. This study investigated bacterial diversity, associated risk factors, and multidrug resistance (MDR) patterns among Gynecological patients in the northeastern region of India. A total of 896 participants were enrolled in the study. Midstream urine specimens were collected and processed using standard microbiological procedures to confirm infection. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, 2022. Of the 896 participants, 278 (31.02%) were microbiologically confirmed as UTI-positive. Significant associations were observed between UTI prevalence and several risk factors, including age 18-39 years (OR 2.14, p < 0.001), previous history of UTI (OR 7.81, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR 2.75, p < 0.001), prior antibiotic use (OR 2.99, p < 0.001), and pregnancy (OR 1.96, p < 0.001). The most prevalent pathogens were Escherichia coli (62.5%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.9%). Notably, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated high resistance to fluoroquinolones, nalidixic acid, ampicillin, and cephalosporins. In contrast, these isolates showed higher susceptibility to fosfomycin, amikacin, gentamicin, ertapenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The findings highlight region-specific antimicrobial resistance trends and underscore the need for targeted antibiotic stewardship policies, continuous surveillance, and routine integration of microbiological testing into Gynecological practice to optimize treatment outcomes and curb the spread of resistant pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.