Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315559›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Domain-specific contexts promote model-based decision making for basketball players.

Liu Yang, Chenglin Zhou, Biao Sang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liu YangSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, No.399, Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Chenglin ZhouSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, No.399, Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China. chenglin_600@126.com.
Biao SangLab for Educational Big Data and Policymaking, Shanghai Academy of Educational Sciences, Shanghai, China. 601208763@qq.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making is a critical component of basketball performance. Within the framework of Reinforcement Learning (RL), understanding the environment and task structure can facilitate model-based (MB) behavior. This study tested whether domain-specific contexts promote MB decision strategies by using the two-stage task in a 2 (Group: basketball players vs. novices) × 2 (Condition: abstract symbols vs. basketball tactical diagrams) mixed design. Thirty-five national basketball players and twenty-seven novices completed both conditions. A hierarchical one-trial-back logistic regression estimated intercept, reward, transition, and reward × transition coefficients; two-factor repeated-measures ANOVAs assessed coefficients, reaction times, and subjective evaluations. Compared to novices, basketball players exhibited a more MB decision-making strategy across all condition, accompanied by higher subjective understanding. Novices exhibited higher reward coefficients indicated a more model-free (MF) tendency. For basketball players, MB strategies were associated with longer RTs, yet longer RTs in novices did not necessarily indicate MB strategies use. These findings show that expertise facilitates the integration of outcome feedback with the task's structure, thereby leading to MB decision-making. Incorporating sport-specific displays into training may enhance decision-making performance without relying on explicit structural instruction.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceBasketballDecision MakingAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeReinforcement Machine LearningRewardYoung AdultExpertiseModel-basedModel-freeReinforcement learningTwo-stage task

Identifiers

PMID42315559
PMCPMC13549960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.