ArticleScientific reports2026
High-resolution photovoltaic power forecasting using machine learning models under seasonal and stress conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate short-term photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting at sub-hourly resolutions is essential for maintaining grid reliability and supporting renewable energy integration. This study benchmarks six machine learning models against a persistence baseline using high-resolution data from the Yulara Solar System (327.6 kW) resampled at 5-, 10-, and 15-minute intervals. A comprehensive preprocessing framework was developed, incorporating cyclical temporal encoding, lag and rolling statistical features, interquartile-range-based outlier filtering, and hyperparameter optimization using RandomizedSearchCV with TimeSeriesSplit. The evaluated models include XGBoost, Decision Tree, Linear Regression, Ridge, Lasso, and Elastic Net. Performance was assessed using multiple error metrics (MAE, RMSE, WAPE, SMAPE, and skill score) across training, validation, testing, seasonal subsets, and stress scenarios involving night-time and highly variable irradiance conditions. Results demonstrate that tree-based models substantially outperform linear regressors in both accuracy and robustness. The Decision Tree achieved the best overall performance, with MAE values of 0.33-0.54 kW and RMSE values of 0.82-1.65 kW, corresponding to 97-98% skill-score improvements over persistence forecasting. XGBoost also showed strong and consistent performance across temporal resolutions and seasonal variations. In contrast, linear models exhibited limited capability in capturing nonlinear PV behavior, particularly under highly variable conditions. These findings highlight the suitability of tree-based approaches for accurate, interpretable, and resilient short-term PV forecasting in smart grid applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.