Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315556›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

High-resolution photovoltaic power forecasting using machine learning models under seasonal and stress conditions.

Hany S E Mansour, Amira S Mohamed, Hassan M Hussein Farh, Al-Wesabi Ibrahim, Abdullah M Al-Shaalan, Abdullahi Bala Kunya, Hany S Elnashar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hany S E MansourElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522, Egypt. Hany_salem@eng.suez.edu.eg.
Amira S MohamedElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522, Egypt.
Hassan M Hussein FarhElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11432, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Wesabi IbrahimCollege of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410083, China.
Abdullah M Al-ShaalanElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11421, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullahi Bala KunyaDepartment of Electrical, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Bushenyi, Uganda. abkunya@kiu.ac.ug.
Hany S ElnasharEgypt-Japan KOSEN (EJ-KOSEN) Institute, 10th of Ramadan City 44629, Egypt.

Funding

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, under Grant ORF-2026-337 ORF-2026-337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate short-term photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting at sub-hourly resolutions is essential for maintaining grid reliability and supporting renewable energy integration. This study benchmarks six machine learning models against a persistence baseline using high-resolution data from the Yulara Solar System (327.6 kW) resampled at 5-, 10-, and 15-minute intervals. A comprehensive preprocessing framework was developed, incorporating cyclical temporal encoding, lag and rolling statistical features, interquartile-range-based outlier filtering, and hyperparameter optimization using RandomizedSearchCV with TimeSeriesSplit. The evaluated models include XGBoost, Decision Tree, Linear Regression, Ridge, Lasso, and Elastic Net. Performance was assessed using multiple error metrics (MAE, RMSE, WAPE, SMAPE, and skill score) across training, validation, testing, seasonal subsets, and stress scenarios involving night-time and highly variable irradiance conditions. Results demonstrate that tree-based models substantially outperform linear regressors in both accuracy and robustness. The Decision Tree achieved the best overall performance, with MAE values of 0.33-0.54 kW and RMSE values of 0.82-1.65 kW, corresponding to 97-98% skill-score improvements over persistence forecasting. XGBoost also showed strong and consistent performance across temporal resolutions and seasonal variations. In contrast, linear models exhibited limited capability in capturing nonlinear PV behavior, particularly under highly variable conditions. These findings highlight the suitability of tree-based approaches for accurate, interpretable, and resilient short-term PV forecasting in smart grid applications.

Indexed as

Decision treeMachine learningPV forecastingShort-term predictionTemporal resolutionXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42315556
PMCPMC13280394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.