Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315539›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enzymatic deinking of used-paper using laccase and cellulase from Metarhizium granulomatis and Aspergillus niger: a sustainable upcycling approach.

Sweta Shrivastava, Sarika Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sweta ShrivastavaDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Tonk, Rajasthan, 304022, India.
Sarika GuptaDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Tonk, Rajasthan, 304022, India. sarika.ashish@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pulp and paper industry is one of the main pillars of the global economy. The average global paper upcycling rate is 60%, with < 30% paper upcycling rate in India. The present investigation focuses the exploration of enzymatic deinking technology (EDT) for the upcycling of used-paper (photocopied/print) using laccase and cellulase enzymes, produced from fungal isolates. Among all the isolated strains, Metarhizium granulomatis and Aspergillus niger showed maximum enzyme activity for laccase (196.786 U/mL) and cellulase (8.471 U/mL), respectively. Gene-specific analysis and protein profiling approach revealed the presence of genes (β-tubulin, eglB, and cbh) responsible for the respective enzyme production. A comparative analysis for paper upcycling between the experimental set (enzyme extract, commercial cellulase, and chemical treatment) revealed an enhancement in the optical/physical properties of upcycled paper (enzyme extract treated). Microbial cellulase achieved the highest deinking efficiency (95.29%) as compared to others. Current novel technology can be deployed for upcycling of used-paper having potential for revitalizing paper upcycling industry globally.

Indexed as

Aspergillus nigerCellulaseLaccaseMetarhiziumPaperFungal ProteinsCellulaseFungal ProteinsLaccaseAspergillus nigerBiobleachingMetarhizium granulomatisPaper industryUpcycling

Identifiers

PMID42315539
PMCPMC13547356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.