ArticleScientific reports2026
Naturalistic driving data extraction and processing for studying driver head scanning behavior at intersections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use and preferences of advanced driver assistance systems by drivers with homonymous visual field loss.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2026Article
- Head Scanning by Drivers With Left Homonymous Visual Field Loss: A Naturalistic Driving Pilot Study.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naturalistic driving (ND) studies offer key insights about real-world driver behavior compared to lab and on-road studies along a fixed course. We describe an ND data processing pipeline for characterizing the scene and driver behavior at intersections. The in-car recording system recorded the vehicle's speed, location, and videos of the cabin and the front scene. Intersection locations were approximately marked from the drive log, and corresponding cabin and scene videos were clipped for ± 100 m segments around the marked intersection locations. Scene videos were processed to extract intersection scene characteristics including the type of signage, vehicle maneuver, traffic density, and to precisely estimate the vehicle's entry and exit from an intersection. Driver head pose in cabin videos was estimated using a custom-developed AI model for wide angle head turns. Evaluation involved 365 manually-annotated intersection instances from 6 vehicles driven in 3 US states. Signage and maneuvers were correctly detected in 99% and 95% of cases, respectively. Median[IQR] intersection entry error was 1.1[0.3-4.2] meters, 0.23 [0.07-0.63] seconds; overlap between estimated and ground truth intersection bounds was 0.88[0.8-0.94]. There was strong positive correlation between estimated and annotated traffic density (R = 0.73, p < 0.001). Head pose estimation over a range of ± 135° had a mean absolute error of 6.75 ± 5.0° and an RMSE of 8.4°. Our approach can potentially allow automated processing of a vast amount of ND data while enabling the study of specific driver behaviors that were previously not achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.