Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315510›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

SAMJ: fast image annotation on ImageJ/Fiji via segment anything model.

Carlos García-López-de-Haro, Caterina Fuster-Barceló, Curtis T Rueden, Jónathan Heras, Vladimír Ulman, Daniel Franco-Barranco, Adrián Inés, Kevin W Eliceiri, Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin, Jean-Yves Tinevez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Physical, chemical, and structural properties of human gastric organoid-derived mucus.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Critical period plasticity enables credit assignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carlos García-López-de-HaroNeuroscience and Life Sciences Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, Spain.
Caterina Fuster-BarcelóBioengineering Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4784-6957
Curtis T RuedenCenter for Quantitative Cell Imaging, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7055-6707
Jónathan HerasDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4775-1306
Vladimír UlmanCentre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-7982
Daniel Franco-BarrancoMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-110X
Adrián InésDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.
Kevin W EliceiriCenter for Quantitative Cell Imaging, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8678-670X
Jean-Christophe Olivo-MarinBioimage Analysis Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jean-Yves TinevezImage Analysis Hub, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0998-4718
Daniel SageBiomedical Imaging Group and Center for Imaging, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. daniel.sage@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-1150-1623
Arrate Muñoz-BarrutiaNeuroscience and Life Sciences Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, Spain. mamunozb@ing.uc3m.es.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-1661

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-10-INBS-04Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-23-IACL-0008Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-23-IACL0008Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-24-INBS-0005Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 945358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate image annotation is essential for training artificial intelligence (AI) systems in biomedical image analysis, enabling tasks such as cell detection, tissue quantification, and disease characterization. However, creating pixel-level annotations is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process that requires expert input, limiting the development and adoption of AI methods. Recent advances in foundation models, such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM), enable interactive object segmentation from simple user prompts, but their integration into widely used bioimage analysis platforms remains limited and often requires technical expertise. Here we show that SAMJ, a user-friendly plugin for ImageJ/Fiji, enables fast, interactive, and accurate image annotation on standard computers without requiring programming skills or specialized hardware. SAMJ integrates efficient SAM variants into a familiar graphical interface, allowing users to delineate objects in large scientific images in real time using simple clicks or bounding boxes. This approach significantly reduces annotation effort, accelerates dataset creation, and broadens access to advanced AI-assisted annotation tools for the biomedical research community.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID42315510
PMCPMC13279790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.