Trial reportBMJ mental health2026
Effect of home visiting support on maternal psychosocial needs and postnatal depression: emulating a target trial.
Trial report in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent and young adult (AYA) mothers often experience unmet psychosocial needs, and those under 25 years of age are at increased risk of perinatal depression. Although home visiting programmes may be beneficial, no controlled trial has evaluated a programme co-designed with first-time AYA mothers and grounded in their lived experiences.
objectiveWe evaluated the effect of the co-designed Early Partnership programme on perceived fulfilment of psychosocial needs and postnatal depressive symptoms among first-time AYA mothers.
methodsWe emulated a target trial using data from a pragmatic historically controlled study in four Tokyo municipalities. Participants were primiparous women aged 16-25 years. The intervention group included 151 participants and the control group included 158 participants. The intervention group received intensive tailored home visits by multi-professional family support workers from pregnancy to 12 months postnatally, and the historical control group received publicly funded health and social services.
findingsRetention at 12 months was high in both groups (intervention group, 82.1%; control group, 82.9%). For the primary outcome analysis, the intervention group had greater improvement in perceived fulfilment of psychosocial needs at 6 months postnatally (difference in mean changes 4.16, 95% CI 1.35 to 6.97, Cohen's
conclusionsThe Early Partnership programme, co-designed with young mothers and delivered by multi-professional teams, was acceptable and effective in improving perceived fulfilment of psychosocial needs and postnatal depressive symptoms. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that a person-centred and relationship-based home visiting model, delivered through a non-stigmatising design, may represent a plausible model of maternal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.