ArticleBMJ open2026
Why do adolescent girls become pregnant? Contextual pathways to adolescent pregnancy in rural Tanzania: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdolescent pregnancy remains a significant public health and social challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, including Tanzania. The study aimed to explore contextual reasons and determinants of adolescent pregnancy among girls using a mixed-methods approach.
designA convergent mixed-methods study integrating a community-based cross-sectional survey with qualitative in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed separately and integrated during interpretation using triangulation and comparative joint analysis.
settingCommunity-based study conducted in Korogwe District, Tanga Region, northeastern Tanzania.
participantsA total of 418 adolescent girls aged 15-19 years were selected through multistage sampling for the quantitative survey. The qualitative component purposively recruited pregnant and parenting adolescents, parents/guardians and community stakeholders. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was adolescent pregnancy, defined as ever having been pregnant, including current pregnancy. Secondary variables included sociodemographic, educational, economic, relational and contraceptive factors associated with adolescent pregnancy.
resultsThe prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in Korogwe District was 16%. In multivariable analysis, older age (18-19 years), school discontinuation, marital union and economic vulnerability were independently associated with adolescent pregnancy. Current contraceptive use was more commonly reported among adolescents who had experienced pregnancy, a finding likely reflecting post pregnancy uptake rather than a protective effect, given the cross-sectional design. Qualitative findings revealed that poverty, transactional relationships, early unions, gendered power imbalances and misconceptions about contraception constrained adolescents' reproductive autonomy. Integrated analysis demonstrated convergence between statistical associations and lived experiences, showing that economic precarity and educational limitations operated as structural pathways influencing early union formation and limiting contraceptive decision making.
conclusionsAdolescent pregnancy among girls aged 15-19 years in Korogwe District is shaped by interrelated socioeconomic, educational and gendered factors. The identified factors and contextual reasons suggest that adolescent pregnancy is a socially patterned outcome rather than solely an individual behavioural issue. Multisectoral interventions addressing school retention, economic insecurity and gender power relations are essential to reduce vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.