ArticleBMJ open2026
Developing a core outcome set for intervention studies in post stroke cognitive impairment (COS-PSCI): a protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPost-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) negatively impacts peoples' quality of life and functional independence. Its complexity poses challenges for both clinical management and intervention research. Despite global guidelines recommending cognitive assessment for all stroke survivors, there is no consensus on what, when or how to measure PSCI. Intervention studies use varied outcome measures, limiting comparability and clinical translation. Developing a core outcome set (COS) for PSCI could address these challenges by standardising outcome measurement, enhancing comparability across studies and facilitating the translation of research into clinical practice. This study aims to develop a COS for intervention research in PSCI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will follow the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD) framework and will be conducted in six stages. First, a scoping review of intervention studies will identify commonly measured outcomes. Second, a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis will explore outcomes valued by stakeholders in the published literature. Third, qualitative focus groups with stroke survivors, support persons, and healthcare professionals will further identify outcomes of importance. Fourth, findings from the preceding stages will be synthesised to generate a comprehensive list of candidate outcomes. Fifth, a real-time modified eDelphi survey with key stakeholders will prioritise outcomes and identify those meeting predefined consensus criteria for inclusion in a Core Outcome Set for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment (COS-PSCI). Finally, international consensus meetings will be held to 1) finalise the COS-PSCI and 2) select appropriate outcome measurement instruments, guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Patient and public involvement (PPI) will be embedded throughout all stages of the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Limerick Education and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (2025_03_18_EHS) and the Health Service Executive Mid-West Research Ethics Committee (REC ref: 0296). Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, international stroke conferences, social media platforms and public engagement events. REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness database and is available at https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/3508.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.