Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315269›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Kate Mallory Anderson, Kirsten Howard, Michelle Dickson, Alana Gall, Darren Garvey, Martin Howell, Maryanne Theobald, Brendan James Mulhern, Rosalie Viney, Gail Garvey

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kate Mallory AndersonYardhura Walani Centre, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia kate.anderson@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-2001
Kirsten HowardLeeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0918-7540
Michelle DicksonThe Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alana GallNational Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Darren GarveyFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Martin HowellLeeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9740-712X
Maryanne TheobaldSchool of Education, Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Brendan James MulhernThe Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.
Rosalie VineyThe Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.
Gail GarveyFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are the future custodians of country, culture and community for the world's oldest living cultures. However, they continue to experience significant disadvantage as a legacy of British colonisation. Failure to address the systemic inequities experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children infringes on their rights to health, education, safety and cultural identity. Despite this, there has been limited focus on recognising and measuring the cultural and personal strengths that support their well-being. This study aims to co-design a culturally grounded, illustrated self-report well-being measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 5-11 years, focusing on the aspects of life that nurture their strength and well-being. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The project will employ a five-phase mixed methods design, guided by principles of co-design and best practices to develop culturally and developmentally responsive measures with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Extending existing methods, we will pioneer a new approach to develop measures enhanced with culturally-responsive pictures co-designed with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approvals have been obtained from the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/HE000607), Western Australian Aboriginal Health Ethics Committee (WAHREC1260), Far North Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/QCH/99346), Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales (2140/23), Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia (04-23-1063), Menzies School of Health Research and Northern Territory Department of Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 2023-4608) and the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee (H/2024/0914), as well as relevant Departments of Education. The final WM2K (

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesPsychological Well-BeingAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleResearch DesignAdolescentCommunity child healthMENTAL HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42315269
PMCPMC13288972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.