Observational studyBMJ open2026
Study protocol for investigating real-world implementation of a combined glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) blood test in the management of adult mild traumatic brain injury in a single-centre European emergency department: the IMPACTS-BRAINI study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07311486 (BLOOD BIOMARKERS TO IMPROVE MANAGEMENT OF MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IMPLIMENTACIÓN STUDY), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Blood biomarkers to improve management of mild traumatic brain injury implimentación study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have been shown to rule out CT-detectable intracranial lesions in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) when assessed within the first 12 hours after injury. These biomarkers have been validated across different laboratory-based and point-of-care testing platforms. The combined biomarker test has been incorporated into several mTBI management algorithms in Europe. However, data regarding its real-world application, including patients with neurological comorbidities and its impact on reducing CT utilisation or emergency department (ED) length of stay, are lacking. This study will evaluate the performance of an automated laboratory-based assay for serum GFAP and UCH-L1 when integrated into a standardised clinical pathway for the diagnostic management of patients with mTBI. In addition, the study will assess its potential value in reducing CT scan prescription and ED time. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre observational study, with prospective data collection before and after the implementation of a combined test measuring GFAP and UCH-L1 in the clinical laboratory, will be conducted at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. Patients with clinically defined mTBI will be managed according to a newly implemented clinical pathway including biomarker testing. mTBI will be defined using predefined clinical criteria including a plausible traumatic mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale score 13-15 assessed 30 min or more after injury, and compatible signs and/or symptoms of brain injury. Eligible patients must undergo blood sampling within 12 hours of injury and before imaging prescription. The effectiveness of this management approach will be compared with a previously established cohort of patients, prospectively enrolled under identical inclusion and exclusion criteria. A cohort of 1000 patients with mTBI, in whom biomarker testing was used in their management, will be included in the post implementation group. The pre-implementation cohort will be drawn from a comparable time period. The primary outcome measures are: the diagnostic performance of GFAP and UCH-L1, measured using an automated assay, for discriminating between patients with positive and negative findings on brain CT scans; the safety of the new clinical pathway in terms of complications such as unexpected surgery or deterioration, as well as the reduction in CT use after the implementation. Secondary objectives will be reduction in ED times and direct costs, as well as physicians' compliance with the algorithms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was reviewed by the Institutional Research Committee of Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain (Ref TP25/0144) and deemed exempt from formal ethical approval and informed consent requirements. This study's results will be presented at national and international meetings, including meetings of patient associations, and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07311486.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.