Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315116›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2026

Women's musculoskeletal health: insights from the 2024 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on chronic conditions.

Melia Matthews, Rachel Cooper, Sarah L Dallas, Sundeep Khosla, Kristi Lengyel, Neena Nizar, Sanique M South, Marjolein C H van der Meulen, Tamara Alliston, Mary L Bouxsein and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melia MatthewsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States.
Rachel CooperAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Sarah L DallasDepartment of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Dentistry, Kansas City, MO, 64108  United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5197-891X
Sundeep KhoslaDivision of Endocrinology and Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2936-4372
Kristi LengyelHead of Healthcare System Strategy, UCB, Smyrna, GA 30080, United States.
Neena NizarJansen's Foundation, Omaha, NE, 68022, United States.
Sanique M SouthDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, United States.
Marjolein C H van der MeulenMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering and Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, 14853, United States.
Tamara AllistonScientific Director Intramural Research Program, NIAMS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States.
Mary L BouxseinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-7414
John J WysolmerskiSection of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3037-1008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2024, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report entitled Advancing Research on Chronic Conditions in Women. A major purpose of this report was to summarize the current state of research into a series of 21 chronic conditions that affect women differently or that are more common in women. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) established a working group to evaluate the NASEM report's implications for women's musculoskeletal (MSK) health. This perspective summarizes key research gaps identified in the NASEM report, including the lack of sex-specific data, underrepresentation of women in clinical studies, and minimal integration of MSK health with other chronic conditions. The NASEM report underscores the need for more comprehensive study designs that consider hormonal, genetic, and social determinants of health across the lifespan. In addition to osteoporosis, in this perspective, the ASBMR working group highlights emerging but poorly understood evidence of detrimental effects on musculoskeletal biology in non-MSK, chronic diseases that were identified in the NASEM report to disproportionately affect women. To advance the field, we advocate for better diagnostics, increased investment, and stronger representation of women in research studies. Addressing these gaps is critical for improving prevention, care, and outcomes for chronic conditions that uniquely or disproportionately affect women.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesWomen's HealthAcademiaChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansUnited Stateschronic conditionsmusculoskeletal healthosteoporosisresearch gapswomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID42315116
PMCPMC13616105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.