Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42314764›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2026

The Effect of Sex and Gender-Role on Social Attention: Investigating the Association With Social Skills and Academic Preferences.

Jeanette A Chacón-Candia, Juan Lupiáñez, Maria Casagrande, Andrea Marotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeanette A Chacón-CandiaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, and Mind, Brain, Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-6015
Juan LupiáñezDepartment of Experimental Psychology, and Mind, Brain, Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Maria CasagrandeDipartimento di Psicologia Dinamica e Clinica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4430-3367
Andrea MarottaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, and Mind, Brain, Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 CEX2023-001312-MMICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER, UE PID2020-114790GB-I00MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER, UE PID2022-143054NB-100The Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities PID2023-148421NB-I00The Spanish State Research Agency JDC2023-052464-IUniversity of Granada UCE-PP2023-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature has shown that both eye-gaze and arrow cues elicit quantitatively similar attentional orienting effects. Nonetheless, a qualitative dissociation between the orienting of attention triggered by these two types of stimuli has been observed under specific methodological conditions. It has been found that, while eye-gaze retains attention at the specific looked-at location, with arrows attention is spread towards broader parts of the environment. However, to date, it remains unclear whether this dissociation may be directly related to individual differences in personal attributes typically associated with higher or lower social skills. The aim of the present study was to explore whether the orienting effects of eye-gaze and arrow cues differ among observers based on their sex, gender-role, academic background and/or social skills. To ensure transparency, the hypotheses and analysis plan for this research were pre-registered. The results showed that although the anticipated arrow-gaze dissociation and the expected relationships among the measured personal attributes were observed, they did not correlate. However, additional analyses revealed a selective association between gaze-driven attentional effects and autistic traits. Overall, these findings suggest that, under the present methodological approach, differences between eye-gaze and arrow orienting effects are not uniformly linked to individual differences in social cognition.

Indexed as

AttentionGender RoleSocial PerceptionSocial SkillsAdultCuesFemaleFixation, OcularHumansIndividualityMaleYoung Adultgaze‐cueingindividual differencessocial attentionsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID42314764
PMCPMC13278808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.