ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2026
Quantifying, Understanding, and Correcting for Delays in Routine Dengue Case Reporting in the Americas.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue virus is a growing public health challenge in the Americas, where endemic-epidemic transmission and unprecedented surges demand timely and accurate surveillance. Although real-time reporting, such as the Pan American Health Organization's (PAHO) database, is central to trend analysis, its case counts are subject to reporting delays and backfilling, which can lead to an initial underestimation of the size of an epidemic and result in insufficient control efforts. A novel, longitudinal dataset of weekly WHO PAHO dengue reports (2022-2025) was compiled, capturing successive data across 46 countries and territories. This dataset enables quantification of reporting factors across delays of up to 60 weeks. Analysis reveals that 91.4% of countries exhibit reporting delays. The average threshold to reach the final case count was 13.9 weeks (interquartile range: 3-17 weeks). Regression modeling revealed that countries that were classified as at very low risk for disaster and had a small population experienced fewer delays in reporting. When the size and severity of an outbreak are considered, severity exerts a stronger influence, resulting in fewer timely reports. The marked heterogeneity across countries in delay dynamics underscores the need to understand and correct for the causes of reporting delays on a country-by-country basis. The study findings provide methodological insights into incorporating robust priors into near-real-time forecasting when direct observations of reporting delay are unavailable. A foundation for improved modeling, enhanced outbreak response, and more resilient public health decision-making at both regional and global scales is established in the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.