ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Prevalence and Risk of Urinary Dysfunction in Cervical and Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Large-Scale Population-Based Study.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective observational study.ObjectivesDegenerative spinal disease, most commonly affecting the cervical and lumbar regions, is a leading cause of disability among the elderly, with its prevalence rising globally. Although urinary dysfunction is a recognized complication, its prevalence and associated risk have not been systematically evaluated in a large-scale population-based setting.MethodsData from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service were analyzed using eight annual datasets from 2009 to 2016, each representing a 3% random sample of the national population. Patients were categorized into cervical, lumbar, combined, and control groups. Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled prevalence of urinary dysfunction. Multivariable logistic regression incorporating age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios, which were subsequently meta-analyzed to derive pooled effect sizes.ResultsThe mean number of patients across datasets was 455,461. The pooled prevalence of urinary dysfunction was 8.7% (95% CI, 8.1-9.3%) in the cervical group, 9.1% (95% CI, 8.3-9.9%) in the lumbar group, 13.7% (95% CI, 12.8-14.7%) in the combined group, and 5.2% (95% CI, 4.8-5.5%) in controls. The pooled adjusted odds ratios were 1.58 (95% CI, 1.52-1.65) for cervical disease, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.47-1.51) for lumbar disease, and 2.24 (95% CI, 2.16-2.33) for combined disease.ConclusionsCervical and lumbar degenerative spinal disease are independently associated with increased urinary dysfunction risk, with the highest risk in patients with combined involvement. Clinicians should be attentive to urinary symptoms in this population, particularly when both regions are affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.