ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2026
Clinically-aligned explainable AI for atrial fibrillation detection: A U-Net inspired multi-lead ECG analysis framework.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDeep learning offers high diagnostic accuracy but often lacks interpretability, hindering clinical adoption for Electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis. This study aims to develop a clinically interpretable, U-Net-inspired deep learning framework for Atrial Fibrillation (AFib) detection that elucidates model decision-making through morphological and rhythmic feature extraction.
methodsWe utilized a U-Net-inspired encoder-decoder architecture to analyze 12-lead ECGs as spatially structured inputs, capturing inter-lead relationships using the PTB-XL database. Model interpretability was assessed using layer-wise Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to visualize hierarchical feature focus. Additionally, we implemented RR interval variability assessment with heart rate stratification and group-specific threshold optimization to account for physiological variations.
resultsOn PTB-XL-Improved labels, the model achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 99.15%, Sensitivity of 97.81%, Specificity of 95.63%, and Precision (PPV) of 95.72%. Performance on the original PTB-XL annotations reached an AUC of 99.78%. Grad-CAM analysis confirmed hierarchical feature extraction, correctly localizing QRS complexes in over 97.5% of cases and P-wave and rhythm irregularities in over 93.1% of cases. Independent RR-interval variability analysis achieved AUCs of 95.5% (slow heart rate), 93.2% (normal), and 91.3% (fast) across three clinically stratified heart rate groups.
conclusionsThis framework successfully combines high diagnostic performance with transparent, clinically aligned visual explanations. The principal contribution is not accuracy alone, but the demonstration that layer-wise explanations can be aligned with the clinical ECG reading sequence, from QRS localization to P-wave morphology. External validation remains necessary before broader clinical generalization can be claimed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.