Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42314117›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

The Open Syndrome Definition as a Machine-Readable Standard for Public Health: Design and Implementation Study.

Ana Paula Gomes Ferreira, Aleksandar Anžel, Izabel Marcilio, Helen Hughes, Alex J Elliot, Jude Dzevela Kong, Madlen Schranz, Alexander Ullrich, Georges Hattab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Paula Gomes FerreiraCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Research, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin, D-13353, Germany, +49 30 18754 0, +49 30 18754 2328.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-853X
Aleksandar AnželCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Research, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin, D-13353, Germany, +49 30 18754 0, +49 30 18754 2328.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0678-2870
Izabel MarcilioCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-6535
Helen HughesReal-time Syndromic Surveillance Team, UK Health Security Agency, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-2983
Alex J ElliotReal-time Syndromic Surveillance Team, UK Health Security Agency, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-3065
Jude Dzevela KongDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Africa-Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Innovation Consortium, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7557-5672
Madlen SchranzInfectious Disease Epidemiology Department, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-5770
Alexander UllrichInfectious Disease Epidemiology Department, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4894-6124
Georges HattabCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Research, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin, D-13353, Germany, +49 30 18754 0, +49 30 18754 2328.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4168-8254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Case definitions are essential for effectively communicating public health threats. However, the absence of a standardized, machine-readable format poses significant challenges to interoperability, epidemiological research, data sharing, and the application of computational methods, including artificial intelligence. These barriers complicate collaboration across regions and organizations and hinder technological progress in public health. Objective: This study aims to propose and release the first open, machine-readable format for representing case and syndrome definitions, together with tools and resources that enable their standardized and scalable use. Methods: We developed the Open Syndrome Definition, a structured, machine-readable schema for representing case and syndrome definitions. We compiled official public health case definitions from multiple institutions and converted them into standardized, machine-readable representations using open-source tools. These tools, available through GitHub under the Massachusetts Institute of Technology license, automate the translation of narrative definitions into structured data. We also created a platform for browsing, analyzing, and contributing new definitions on our initiative website. Results: The Open Syndrome Definition format enabled consistent, automated representation of case definitions across different diseases and jurisdictions. The conversion tools achieved high semantic fidelity, as assessed by qualitative expert review, between narrative and structured representations, supporting human verification and automated analysis. The dataset and accompanying tools demonstrated structural and semantic interoperability by standardizing definitions from various health systems into a unified format and integrating existing medical ontologies through JSON for Linked Data. To further illustrate practical applicability and downstream usage, we introduced a data filtering prototype that allows users to upload their own datasets and verify the results against the standardized definitions. Conclusions: The Open Syndrome Definition establishes a foundation for consistent and machine-readable public health definitions, facilitating reproducible research and interoperability at scale. By enabling systematic data exchange and artificial intelligence-driven analysis, it strengthens public health preparedness and supports more rapid, coordinated responses to emerging health threats.

Indexed as

Public HealthArtificial IntelligenceHumansAIartificial intelligencedata standardizationepidemiological monitoringhealth information exchangepublic healthpublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42314117
PMCPMC13278462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.