ArticleBlood advances2026
Outcomes of adolescents and young adults with AML treated on pediatric vs adult protocols.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractAdolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represent a biologically and clinically distinct population managed across pediatric and adult oncology services, with no established optimal treatment paradigm. In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed 81 AYA patients aged 14 to 29 years with newly diagnosed AML treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2010 and 2025. Patients were stratified by treating service, European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 risk category, and induction regimen. Pediatric patients received 2 cycles of cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide-based induction, whereas adult patients received 1 cycle of cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3) induction, 3 of whom required 7+3 reinduction, followed by risk-adapted consolidation including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Composite complete response rates were similar between adult and pediatric cohorts (79% vs 78%), as were rates of minimal residual disease negativity by multicolor flow cytometry among responders (63% vs 55%). Despite comparable depth of response, 5-year overall survival favored adult-service patients in both the full cohort (77.9% vs 56.7%) and the ELN 2022 intermediate-adverse risk subgroup (62.7% vs 47.9%), whereas relapse-free survival was nearly identical. On multivariable analysis, ELN 2022 risk retained independent prognostic significance, whereas treatment protocol did not. These findings demonstrate that pediatric-style and adult AML regimens achieve comparable remission depth in AYA patients. The survival advantage observed with adult protocols challenges the assumption that further cytotoxic intensification improves outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.