ArticlePLoS biology2026
Learning engages transient and sustained cellular mechanisms in the human brain.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural neuroplasticity supports learning, development, and shapes vulnerability to brain disorders, making it a central priority in neuroscience research. However, progress in humans has remained limited by the inability to probe cellular processes in vivo, leaving mechanistic insight largely dependent on animal models. To address this gap, here we combined the sub-voxel sensitivity of ultra-high-gradient diffusion MRI with the cell-compartment specificity of the Soma and Neurite Density Imaging (SANDI) model to probe structural plasticity directly in the living human brain. By tracking how learning modulates the temporal dynamics of cell bodies and cell processes, we aimed to distinguish plastic from nonplastic biological processes driving changes in microstructure. We found that learning a motor skill triggered two distinct temporal responses: a transient expansion of cell bodies across all brain regions engaged by the task, consistent with a short-lived homeostatic mechanism, and a sustained increase in cell-process density restricted to key motor regions, consistent with structural plasticity. Our approach provides a mechanistic window into human neuroplasticity and marks a significant step toward bridging the gap between animal and human neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.