Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313858›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Comparative analysis of gut microbiome alterations in early- and late-onset preeclampsia: A case control study.

Sofie Meijer, Luisa W Hugerth, Mehrnaz Nouri, Lena Erlandsson, Shahram Lavasani, Stefan R Hansson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sofie MeijerDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5246-2758
Luisa W HugerthDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mehrnaz NouriImmuneBiotech AB, Lund, Sweden.
Lena ErlandssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Shahram LavasaniDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Stefan R HanssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7838-9074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a complication during pregnancy characterized by hypertension, organ damage, and systemic inflammation. Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiome may play a role in the pathophysiology of PE. However, previous studies on the gut microbiome have generally overlooked the distinction between subgroups of PE, although clinical manifestations may differ. Also, most studies have not used deep sequencing techniques. Therefore, this study aimed to explore further potential differences in gut dysbiosis in different PE subgroups compared to controls using shotgun metagenomics. We studied the bacterial gut microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing in 37 pregnant patients in the third trimester from a Swedish cohort, separating patients according to subtype (healthy controls N = 21, late-onset PE N = 8, early-onset PE N = 8). Differential relative abundances and alpha diversity were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum test, and beta diversity was evaluated using PERMANOVA. Multiple linear regression was used to study associations between gut microbiome composition differences and clinical parameters. Late-onset PE and early-onset PE were both associated with significantly different beta diversity compared to controls. Differences remained significant after adjusting for age, and were not affected by gestational age, BMI or parity. Alpha diversity was lower in late-onset PE compared to controls. While no significant differences in taxonomic abundances were seen after correcting for multiple testing, several interesting leads were identified, including a higher abundance of genus Blautia in late-onset PE, and lower abundance of Coprococcus catus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae in early-onset PE. Functional analysis did not reveal any significant differences after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. In conclusion, our results showed subgroup-specific gut microbiome differences in PE with more pronounced associations in late-onset PE, despite limited power due to the observational design and small cohort. Accordingly, our results highlight the importance of subgroup analysis when studying PE.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePre-EclampsiaAdultBacteriaCase-Control StudiesDysbiosisFemaleHumansMetagenomicsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42313858
PMCPMC13278574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.