ArticlePloS one2026
Biodiversity drives the choice; linguistic diversity fine-tunes the direction: Ethnofloral megadiversity in the Mexican ethnobotany.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People around the world have developed distinctive sets of useful plants, known as ethnofloras, which comprise a significant portion of Earth's biodiversity. However, little is known about the factors that determine the composition of these collections and how different groups use plants. These differences may increase with geographic distance and linguistic separation due to barriers to communication and a lack of similarity in locally-available species. Using published ethnobotanical information, we analyzed the divergence in the composition of wild-species and the ways plants are used among 22 Mexican ethnic groups that use 2,855 species. We standardized plant use into ten categories and recorded them for each plant species and ethnic group. Each ethnic group uses a very large number of species (α-diversity), but few species are shared with other groups. Consequently, species turnover (β-diversity) between ethnic groups is very high. As expected, geographic distance fostered high differentiation in species composition of ethnofloras, probably reflecting differences in wild floras. Linguistic proximity promoted ethnoflora composition similarity, suggesting that communication plays a role in shaping the set of plants that are used. Geographic proximity also promotes similarity in how plants are used, though it is unclear whether language also plays a role. This suggests that language barriers are quite permeable. Social interactions and the use of Spanish as a lingua franca may favor the convergence of uses. This study provides a novel analysis of ethnofloras. It emphasizes the value of cultural and biological diversity and their importance in shaping ethnobotanical heritage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.