Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313806›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Quantifying and modeling fabric surface roughness discrepancy: Consistency between physical and digital textures in online shopping.

Eugene Lee, Youngjoo Chae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eugene LeeDepartment of Clothing & Textiles, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5860-6994
Youngjoo ChaeDepartment of Clothing & Textiles, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5077-9548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In digital textile commerce, the absence of tactile interaction limits consumers' ability to perceive fabric properties, often leading to mismatched expectations and product dissatisfaction. This study aimed to quantify the perceptual discrepancy in surface roughness (RDP) between physical fabrics and their digital representations and to identify structural parameters that influence this discrepancy. Plain- and twill-woven fabric specimens were prepared with varying densities, weights, and thicknesses. Surface roughness of physical fabrics was measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM), while digital roughness values were extracted from scanned images using ImageJ. Statistical analyses, including correlation and regression modeling, were applied to identify key predictors of RDP. Results showed that in plain-woven fabrics, lower weft density and higher warp density under fixed fabric weight conditions yielded the lowest RDP values, whereas in twill-woven fabrics, the perceptual gap was minimized at higher fabric weights and lower weft densities. These findings provide practical insights for improving visual-tactile alignment in virtual textile presentation and can inform fabric structural design for enhanced accuracy in online representation. Future research may explore nonlinear modeling and multisensory feedback systems to further reduce perceptual discrepancies.

Indexed as

CommerceTextilesHumansMicroscopy, Atomic ForceSurface PropertiesTouch

Identifiers

PMID42313806
PMCPMC13278417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.