Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Harvester perceptions of pesticide impacts on snail collection along Cameroon's Atlantic coast.

Yannick Elysée Ewane Epée, Annick Niquaise Enangue Njembele, Christian Bernard Kaldjob Mbeh, Emmanuel Ndinga Go'o, Alexis Hamdja Ngoniri, Kingsley Agbor Etchu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yannick Elysée Ewane EpéeNjombe Multipurpose Agricultural Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Njombe, Cameroon.
Annick Niquaise Enangue NjembeleSpecialized Research Station for Marine Ecosystems, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Kribi, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3465-1816
Christian Bernard Kaldjob MbehMbalmayo Agricultural Research Centre, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Mbalmayo, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2461-2135
Emmanuel Ndinga Go'oSpecialized Research Station for Marine Ecosystems, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Kribi, Cameroon.
Alexis Hamdja NgoniriNational Institute of Cartography (INC), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Kingsley Agbor EtchuNkolbisson Headquarter, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Nkolbisson, Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coastal regions of Cameroon comprising South-West, Littoral, and South are major agricultural hubs and important zones for harvesting African giant land snails (Achatinidae). Snail collection provides both a vital protein source for local consumers and a source of income for harvesters. Agricultural intensification has increased pesticide use in these areas, raising concerns about potential impacts on snail populations and human health. This study assessed harvesters' perceptions of how pesticides influence the quantity and size of snails collected. A total of 211 harvesters from six localities (Kribi, Buea, Limbe, Mbanga, Njombe-Penja, and Dibamba) were surveyed through interviews and participant observations. Descriptive statistics and regression models were applied to explore socio-demographic influences on perceptions. Results showed that while 58% of harvesters believed pesticides reduce snail size, 61% did not perceive an effect on snail quantity. Snail collection was reported to be most successful during nocturnal periods and in October, aligning with ecological seasonality. Regression analysis revealed a weak but statistically significant association between perceptions of pesticide impacts and reported harvesting quantities (R² = 0.065), with perceived effects on snail quantity emerging as the only significant predictor. Despite awareness of pesticide risks, 63% of respondents expressed no interest in snail farming, citing preference for wild harvesting. This study highlights local knowledge on pesticide risks but also reveals a gap between awareness and adaptive practices. Findings are framed as perceptions, not direct ecological measurements, and they underline the need for awareness campaigns, sustainable harvesting practices, and supportive policies for alternative snail production systems.

Indexed as

PesticidesSnailsAgricultureAnimalsCameroonFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSeasonsPesticides

Identifiers

PMID42313795
PMCPMC13278449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.