ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Predicting and differentiating accidental and self-harm drug poisonings using health records data.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preventing drug poisonings or overdoses will involve both generic poisoning prevention strategies and strategies specific to self-harm poisonings. This research used health records to develop statistical models predicting drug poisoning in general and self-harm poisoning in particular after an outpatient mental health specialty visit or primary care visit with mental health diagnosis. Records regarding visits from 2015 to 2019 in four health systems were used to develop models predicting poisoning following a two-step process: prediction of any poisoning or overdose followed by differentiating self-harm from accidental or undetermined intent poisoning or overdose. Separate random forest models for mental health specialty and primary care mental health visits were developed in 70% random samples of visits and validated in the remaining 30%. Among 19,130,028 visits, 114,911 (0.60%) were followed by any poisoning and 52,063 (0.27%) by self-harm poisoning. Models had moderate performance predicting any poisoning (Area under the Receiver Operating Curve or AUC = 0.778 among mental health specialty visits and 0.767 among primary care mental health visits) and good performance for specifically predicting self-harm poisoning (AUCs = 0.836 and 0.858 respectively). Mental health visits with risk above the 95th percentile accounted for 39.7% of self-harm poisoning (sensitivity) and actual risk of 2.57% (positive predictive value). Predictors of any poisoning included prior self-harm, accidental poisoning, and mental health service use. Specific predictors of self-harm poisoning included age and prior mental health diagnoses or treatments. In conclusion, among outpatients with mental health diagnoses, prediction models using records data have moderate accuracy predicting any overdose or poisoning and good accuracy predicting self-harm poisoning. Self-harm and accidental poisoning have both shared and distinct predictors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.