ArticlePloS one2026
First steps towards distinguishing Mediterranean vegetation root marks on bones: An experimental approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Root-bone interactions are common in buried skeletal remains, yet their diagnostic value remains largely unexplored because few controlled studies have linked root marks to specific plant types. Consequently, the potential of these marks to provide information about burial environments in archaeological, paleontological, and forensic contexts has been largely overlooked. Here, we present a long-term experimental study documenting root-induced bone modifications under natural field conditions in central Spain. Deer ribs were buried at various depths and for different lengths of time among three widespread Mediterranean trees and shrubs: holm oak (Quercus ilex), olive (Olea europaea), and grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Using optical and scanning electron microscopy, we identified distinct patterns of root engraving on cortical bone surfaces that varied by plant type. Holm oak roots produced sinuous, dendritic grooves; olive roots generated shallow, rectilinear markings; and grapevine roots formed linear-to-circular engravings, which were often associated with localized cracking. Mark intensity increased with burial depth and duration. These findings underscore the diagnostic value of root marks in identifying plant-specific signatures and offer a novel approach to recognizing plant activity in burial environments. This information improves taphonomic interpretations in various fields, including fossil reworking processes and forensic secondary burials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.