ArticlePloS one2026
Nonlinear regression modeling of ruminal fermentation dynamics in buffered diets using in vitro gas production.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding ruminal fermentation dynamics is essential for improving feed efficiency in ruminant nutrition. This study evaluated several nonlinear regression models to describe in vitro gas production kinetics in diets with different forage-to-concentrate ratios and buffer inclusion. Fermentation experiments were conducted using total mixed rations containing various concentrate levels, both with and without dietary buffers. Cumulative gas production data were fitted to exponential, logistic, Gompertz, and Michaelis-Menten models. Model performance was assessed using statistical goodness-of-fit criteria and the biological relevance of the estimated parameters. The results showed that buffer supplementation enhanced fermentation kinetics by stabilizing pH, increasing total gas production, and modifying volatile fatty acid profiles. Although no single model consistently outperformed others, model suitability depended on the specific diet-buffer combination. Sigmoidal models generally provided better fits for buffered diets, whereas exponential models were more accurate under high-concentrate, unbuffered conditions. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting context-specific models for analyzing ruminal fermentation data. The integration of in vitro gas production and nonlinear modeling offers a reliable approach to evaluate dietary strategies that improve nutrient utilization and feed efficiency in ruminant systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.