SynthesisComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Probiotics and Their Functional Role in Mitigating Antinutrient Effects In Vivo-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antinutrients like phytic acid and oxalates reduce mineral bioavailability by forming insoluble complexes with iron, zinc, and calcium. Probiotic supplementation may counteract these effects through enzymatic activity (e.g., phytase, oxalate decarboxylase) and microbiota modulation. This PRISMA-based meta-analysis evaluated 27 in vivo studies (chickens, mice, rats) published between 2005 and 2025. Controlled trials assessing probiotic effects on mineral absorption under antinutrient-rich diets were analyzed using random effects models, expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Probiotic supplementation may enhance selected markers of mineral bioavailability across animal models (broiler, mouse, and rats), although the certainty of evidence was low and between-study heterogeneity was substantial. In broiler chickens, probiotics increased hepatic iron (SMD = 2.05; CI: 0.91-3.20) and liver ferritin levels (SMD = 2.85; CI: 0.90-4.80). In rat models of hyperoxaluria, probiotics reduced renal calcium oxalate deposition (SMD = 0.77; p = 0.0001), though the impact on urinary oxalate levels was not significant (SMD = 0.20). In mouse models, the interventions demonstrated improved gut microbiota diversity without significant alterations in total body weight (SMD = 0.02). Based on low-certainty evidence from heterogeneous animal studies, probiotic supplementation may improve selected mineral-bioavailability outcomes and may reduce calcium oxalate deposition under antinutrient-rich conditions. These findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further well-designed, species-specific studies using standardized interventions and outcome measures are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.