Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313559›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

Changes in Medication Use After Medicare Part D Annual Out-of-Pocket Spending Caps.

Christopher L Cai, Kelly E Anderson, Aaron S Kesselheim, Benjamin N Rome

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher L CaiProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kelly E AndersonProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin N RomeProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) implemented annual out-of-pocket spending caps to the Medicare Part D prescription medication benefit in 2024; the caps were lowered to $2000 in 2025. It remains unclear how this policy affected medication access. Objective: To evaluate changes in prescription medication fills in the Medicare population after the implementation of the IRA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used data from an all-payer pharmacy database (Symphony Health Metys) to evaluate changes in quarterly prescription fills for medications reimbursed by Medicare and commercial insurance from 2022 to 2025. Using an event study, difference-in-differences framework, changes in per-capita prescriptions for medications before and after the Medicare annual out-of-pocket spending caps were implemented in 2024 were compared. Because out-of-pocket caps are most relevant for patients using expensive medications, medications were stratified based on monthly cost: low (<$100), medium ($100-$829), high ($830-$6999), and very high (≥$7000). Main Outcomes and Measures: Quarterly per-capita fills by medication. Results: Among 3053 medications covering 92.9% of gross Medicare Part D spending in 2023, 1534 (50.2%) were low cost, 882 (28.9%) were medium cost, 455 (14.9%) were high cost, and 182 (6.0%) were very high cost. After the spending caps were implemented, average medication use increased in Medicare compared with medication use in commercial insurance, with larger increases for higher-cost medications. In pre-post difference-in-differences analyses, there was no change in Medicare vs commercial use of low-cost, medium-cost, or high-cost medications. Very-high-cost medication use increased by 22.7% (95% CI, 6.0% to 42.0%; P = .01). Use of medications in Medicare increased over time in event-study analyses, although CIs were wide; by the fourth quarter of 2025, the use of medications in Medicare compared with commercial insurance increased from baseline by 4.1% (95% CI, -3.4% to 12.3%) for low-cost medications, 20.7% (95% CI, -10.7% to 63.0%) for medium-cost medications, 23.1% (95% CI, 2.7% to 47.4%) for high-cost medications, and 35.9% (95% CI, -4.1% to 92.3%) for very-high-cost medications. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that medication use increased after implementation of Medicare annual out-of-pocket cost caps, particularly among the highest-cost medications. These results suggest that the policy substantially improved patient access to high-cost medications for Medicare-insured patients.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresMedicare Part DPrescription DrugsDrug CostsHumansUnited StatesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID42313559
PMCPMC13280702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.