ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2026
The role of moral identity in ideological obsession and violent extremism.
Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research examines how ideological passion shapes moral identity and support for political violence, drawing on the Dualistic Model of Passion to distinguish between obsessive (OP) and harmonious passion (HP). Across six studies with diverse ideological groups, OP consistently predicted the adoption of a villainous moral identity, whereas HP predicted a heroic identity. Studies 1A (N = 202; Democrats) and 1B (N = 232; Republicans) showed that OP was associated with villain identity, which mediated support for political violence. Study 2 (N = 315; environmentalists) experimentally manipulated passion, demonstrating that an OP mindset increased villain identification and violent endorsement. Study 3 (N = 179; Black Lives Matter supporters) manipulated moral identity directly, revealing that adopting a villain role amplified support for political violence. Studies 4 (N = 277; U.S. Muslims) and 5 (N = 294; Republicans, preregistered) examined mechanisms of appeal, showing that OP individuals perceived villains as warm, which reinforced villain identification. Finally, Study 6 (N = 236; environmentalists) showed that villain identity was tied to a coherent pattern of moral inversion-villains recast as justified and not harmful, heroes as harmful-which in turn predicted support for political violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.