Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313485›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of primary health care2026

Digital clinic users in Finnish public primary care: their characteristics, reasons for visits, and equity considerations - a register study.

Kaisa Kujansivu, Elina Tolvanen, Tapio Haaga, Lauri Sääksvuori, Mika Kortelainen, Oskari Nokso-Koivisto, Tuomas H Koskela

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaisa KujansivuTampere University.
Elina TolvanenTampere University.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-8610
Tapio HaagaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).ORCID 0000-0003-1771-7289
Lauri SääksvuoriFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).ORCID 0000-0002-6960-043X
Mika KortelainenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).ORCID 0000-0001-7868-9651
Oskari Nokso-KoivistoAalto University.ORCID 0009-0001-0339-1508
Tuomas H KoskelaTampere University.ORCID 0000-0002-1518-4944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChat-based digital clinics have become an increasingly important gateway to primary healthcare in many countries. This exploratory study describes the socio-demographic characteristics of digital clinic users, examines patterns of digital clinic use among potentially vulnerable population groups, and compares the medical reasons for chat-based digital clinic contacts with those of traditional primary care. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted an observational register-based study using nationwide data covering digital and traditional contacts to public and private primary care clinics in Finland from January 2022 to February 2025. Using a rich linked dataset, we examined several potentially vulnerable socioeconomic subgroups, including individuals aged 80 and above, those with multimorbidity, the unemployed, and members of the lowest income quintile. The study population comprised 1,599,588 individuals residing in eight wellbeing services counties in Finland.

resultsPublic digital clinic users appeared to be younger, more often women, and more often live in urban areas, and have a lower prevalence of chronic illnesses compared with users of traditional public primary care. Potentially vulnerable patient groups also used digital services, although they used traditional services more. Medical reasons for digital clinic contacts were often relatively simple, but individuals with chronic illnesses also used digital services to address their care needs. DISCUSSION: We observed differences in the characteristics of users of digital and traditional primary healthcare services. We generated hypotheses for future research on equity in digital healthcare access. Further research is needed to evaluate whether improving access to digital services for vulnerable groups could support health equity.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTelemedicineAccess to Primary CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseDigital HealthFemaleFinlandHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantDigital healtheHealthprimary careremote consultationtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42313485
PMCPMC13288721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.