ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2026
Enhancing Histological Visualization of Tooth and Bone Ground Sections Using Terminalia chebula Stain: A Comparative Analysis.
Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Histological Visualization of Tooth and Bone Ground Sections Using Terminalia chebula Stain: A Comparative Analysis.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVisualization of mineralized tissues such as tooth and bone in ground sections is widely used for histological studies. However, unstained ground sections often provide limited contrast and obscure microscopic details. Natural plant-based stains have been explored as cost-effective and safer alternatives to synthetic dyes. Terminalia chebula, rich in tannins and polyphenolic compounds, has shown potential staining affinity for hard tissues.
objectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate the staining efficacy of T. chebula on ground sections of tooth and bone by comparing stained and unstained sections, and to assess contrast, structural detail, and observer acceptance under stereomicroscope and compound microscope.
methodsForty extracted normal teeth and 40 bone samples from human skulls were prepared into thin ground sections (~50 μm). Each section was initially observed unstained (Group 2) and then stained with T. chebula extract for 4 h (Group 1). Photomicrographs were taken under both microscopes and evaluated by blinded oral pathologists and students for contrast, structural detail, and acceptance using standardized grading and scoring systems.
resultsT. chebula staining significantly improved contrast in tooth sections under both stereomicroscope and compound microscope (p < 0.001). Enhanced visualization of enamel rods, dentinal tubules, and cementum was observed. Bone sections demonstrated improvement in contrast under stereomicroscopy; however, under compound microscopy, unstained bone sections showed relatively higher Grade 1 contrast. Improvements in structural detail were more pronounced in tooth sections than bone sections. Observer acceptance was significantly higher for stained tooth sections (p < 0.001), whereas moderate but significant improvement was noted for bone sections.
conclusionT. chebula stain enhances contrast and improves visualization of microstructural features in tooth ground sections, supporting its potential as an effective and economical adjunct for teaching and research in dental histology. Further studies are required to optimize staining protocols and to evaluate its broader applicability, particularly in bone specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.