Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313398›Full record

Observational studyEpilepsia open2026

Real-world effectiveness of cenobamate in drug-resistant and ultra-refractory epilepsy: A multicenter study.

Ondřej Strýček, Jana Amlerová, Martin Pail, Jitka Kočvarová, Jana Slonková, Martin Šimčík, Kateřina Stanzelová, Monika Šibalová, Petr Marusič, Milan Brázdil

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ondřej StrýčekBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3636-9056
Jana AmlerováDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-3740
Martin PailBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2059-4822
Jitka KočvarováBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-1091
Jana SlonkováDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-6846
Martin ŠimčíkDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4443-1423
Kateřina StanzelováDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8832-7751
Monika ŠibalováInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0638-713X
Petr MarusičDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1240-653X
Milan BrázdilBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-2343

Funding

IBA Foundation 21396566Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky NW25-04-00345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the real-world effectiveness, safety, and treatment retention of cenobamate (CNB) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), including ultra-refractory epilepsy (URE), high seizure burden, and extensive prior treatment history.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of 500 adults with DRE (focal or combined epilepsy) who were treated with CNB at three Czech tertiary epilepsy centers. Among these patients, 83.4% met criteria for URE. Seizure outcomes, treatment retention, and adverse events were analyzed, with stratification by treatment duration and cumulative ASM exposure (number of previous and concomitant anti-seizure medications). Primary outcomes were ≥ 50% responder rate and seizure freedom at 12 months.

resultsAmong 436 patients with evaluable seizure data after ≥ 3 months of CNB treatment, 55.7% achieved ≥ 50% seizure reduction and 16.5% became seizure-free. At 12 months (n = 331), ≥ 50% response was achieved in 61.6%, and 18.1% became seizure-free. Among patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures or bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, 46.1% achieved seizure freedom at 12 months. CNB efficacy persisted across high cumulative ASM burden, with seizure freedom in 22.7%, 20.2%, and 10.4% of patients with ≤ 5, 6-10, and > 10 ASMs, respectively. Multivariable analyses identified high baseline seizure burden, greater cumulative ASM exposure (> 10 ASMs), and concomitant use of sodium channel blockers as independent negative predictors of treatment response. Treatment retention at 12 months was 83.0%. SIGNIFICANCE: CNB was effective and well-tolerated in a highly treatment-resistant population. Although seizure freedom rates declined with increasing cumulative ASM burden, CNB retained clinically meaningful efficacy even in highly refractory patients. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The study examined the effectiveness of cenobamate in routine clinical practice in adults with highly treatment-resistant epilepsy. In a large multicenter cohort, many patients achieved substantial seizure reduction, including complete seizure freedom, despite extensive prior treatment. Most patients remained on cenobamate during follow-up, consistent with good effectiveness and tolerability in routine clinical practice. These findings indicate that cenobamate can offer meaningful benefits even in very difficult-to-treat epilepsy and may inform treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCarbamatesChlorophenolsDrug Resistant EpilepsyTetrazolesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsCarbamatesCenobamateChlorophenolsTetrazolescenobamatedrug‐resistant epilepsyreal‐world data

Identifiers

PMID42313398
PMCPMC13394743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.