Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313383›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

The Texas Abortion Ban and Maternal Mental Health.

Mir M Ali, Alyssa L Burnett, Jonathan H Cantor, Annie Song, Fang Zhang, Hao Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mir M AliUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Alyssa L BurnettDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan H CantorRAND, Santa Monica, California.
Annie SongHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Fang ZhangDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hao YuDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Maternal mental health disorders are among the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. In the US, the 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization and ensuing state-level abortion restrictions have raised concerns that such policies may worsen maternal health and mental health outcomes. Objective: To examine the association of the implementation of Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8) abortion law, which banned abortions after embryonic cardiac activity in September 2021, with maternal mental health outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study used a difference-in-differences (DiD) design with pooled data from the 2016 to 2023 National Survey of Children's Health. The nationally representative sample included US mothers aged 18 to 49 years who lived with at least 1 child aged 0 to 17 years. Data were analyzed from April to October 2025. Exposure: Mothers residing in Texas represented the treatment group, and mothers in states without abortion bans (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming) served as the control group. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mothers' self-reported fair or poor mental and emotional health. Logistic regression models, adjusted for child-, mother-, and household-level characteristics, were used to estimate changes in the probability of mental health outcomes for mothers coinciding with SB8 implementation. Similar models were estimated with maternal physical health and fathers' mental health as outcomes for sensitivity analyses. Results: The sample included 4323 mothers in Texas (47.2% [95% CI, 45.1%-49.4%] aged 30-39 years) and 152 573 mothers in nonban states (47.1% [95% CI, 46.4%-47.7%] aged 30-39 years). Compared with mothers in nonban states, those in Texas experienced a statistically significant increase in the likelihood of reporting fair or poor mental health following SB8's implementation (DiD estimate, 2.52 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.02-5.01 percentage points). The largest increases were observed among mothers of children with public insurance (DiD estimate, 7.06 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.83-13.29 percentage points). No significant outcomes were observed for mothers' physical health outcomes or fathers' mental health in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional study, the implementation of an abortion ban in Texas was associated with a worsening of maternal mental health among reproductive-age mothers relative to mothers in states without such bans. These results underscore the association of abortion restrictions with maternal mental health and highlight the need to strengthen support in the post-Dobbs policy environment.

Indexed as

Abortion, LegalMaternal HealthMental HealthMothersAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyTexasYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42313383
PMCPMC13280700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.