Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313354›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026

Adsorption treatment of

Rintaro Sato, Noriaki Miyaji, Koki Hasegawa, Yuma Ihara, Shigenori Yabe, Katsuyuki Kikori, Naochika Akiya, Kaito Wachi, Akemi Minami, Kosuke Yamashita and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rintaro Sato *Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Noriaki Miyaji *Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. noriaki.miyaji@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1518-831X
Koki HasegawaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Yuma IharaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Shigenori YabeDepartment of Radiology, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Katsuyuki KikoriDepartment of Radiology, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Naochika AkiyaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Kaito WachiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Akemi MinamiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Kosuke YamashitaDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tensho YamaoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Takashi OhbaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Kenta MiwaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Noboru OriuchiAdvanced Clinical Research Center, Fukushima Global Medical Science Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe rapid global expansion of targeted radionuclide therapy using

methodsRadioactive wastewater samples were collected from a storage tank in a targeted radionuclide therapy ward. The adsorption efficiency of various adsorbents, including Chelex resin, Bondesil-C18 and granular activated carbon, was assessed using both batch and column methods. Adsorption efficiency was measured as counts at 208 keV using a high-purity germanium detector.

resultsThe adsorption efficiency of Chelex resin and Bondesil-C18 in 100 mL of radioactive wastewater, was below 25%, whereas that of granular activated carbon was 85.9%. The adsorption efficiency of batch and column methods increased with adsorbent mass and processing time. The column method with small amounts of granular activated carbon achieved 60%-70% adsorption efficiency within ~ 7 min in a single-pass operation.

conclusionAdsorption treatment using granular activated carbon was effective for the removal of

Indexed as

Adsorption efficiencyColumn methodRadioactive wastewaterTargeted radionuclide therapy

Identifiers

PMID42313354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.