ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Upholding Human Dignity as a First Principle: Preventive Moral Injury Work in NATO Chaplaincy.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This reflective article proposes a strategic principle for North Atlantic Treaty Orgnization (NATO) military chaplaincy services aimed at strengthening preventive efforts related to moral injury in war. Contemporary military research increasingly recognizes the moral, spiritual and existential consequences of warfare, which are not fully addressed by traditional psychiatric models, yet a growing body of scholarship highlights the role that chaplains may play in addressing moral injury. However, knowledge of how to prevent moral injury during ongoing full-scale war remains limited. The article draws on empirical insights from Ukrainian military chaplains operating in a context of full-scale war, where their work largely centers on sustaining ethics, morality, and character among military personnel. From these experiences, an overarching principle is derived: human dignity first. Defending human dignity is understood as a continuous effort to counter dehumanization and preserve the human dimension in a context that persistently erodes moral boundaries. Within NATO, each member state retains full responsibility for its own chaplaincy services, making structural standardization neither feasible nor desirable. This article argues, however, that the principle of human dignity first can function as a unifying, non-programmatic framework for NATO chaplaincy without altering national structures, roles, or cultural contexts. At the same time, it supports operational effectiveness, leadership, and decision-making and may be understood as an implicit preventive approach to moral injury. In conclusion, human dignity first is proposed as a strategic principle that may strengthen cohesion, interoperability, and long-term sustainability within NATO military chaplaincy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42313353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.