Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313353›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Upholding Human Dignity as a First Principle: Preventive Moral Injury Work in NATO Chaplaincy.

Jan Grimell, Matthias Inniger, Tatiana Letovaltseva, Laura Mudde, Niklas Peuckmann, Carmen Schuhmann, Janne Aalto, Alexandra Dierks, Tabitta Flyger, Taavi Laanepere

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jan GrimellEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. jan.grimell@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-8519
Matthias InnigerEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Tatiana LetovaltsevaEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Laura MuddeEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Niklas PeuckmannEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Carmen SchuhmannEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Janne AaltoEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Alexandra DierksEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Tabitta FlygerEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Taavi LaanepereEuropean Research Unit for Military Chaplaincy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This reflective article proposes a strategic principle for North Atlantic Treaty Orgnization (NATO) military chaplaincy services aimed at strengthening preventive efforts related to moral injury in war. Contemporary military research increasingly recognizes the moral, spiritual and existential consequences of warfare, which are not fully addressed by traditional psychiatric models, yet a growing body of scholarship highlights the role that chaplains may play in addressing moral injury. However, knowledge of how to prevent moral injury during ongoing full-scale war remains limited. The article draws on empirical insights from Ukrainian military chaplains operating in a context of full-scale war, where their work largely centers on sustaining ethics, morality, and character among military personnel. From these experiences, an overarching principle is derived: human dignity first. Defending human dignity is understood as a continuous effort to counter dehumanization and preserve the human dimension in a context that persistently erodes moral boundaries. Within NATO, each member state retains full responsibility for its own chaplaincy services, making structural standardization neither feasible nor desirable. This article argues, however, that the principle of human dignity first can function as a unifying, non-programmatic framework for NATO chaplaincy without altering national structures, roles, or cultural contexts. At the same time, it supports operational effectiveness, leadership, and decision-making and may be understood as an implicit preventive approach to moral injury. In conclusion, human dignity first is proposed as a strategic principle that may strengthen cohesion, interoperability, and long-term sustainability within NATO military chaplaincy.

Indexed as

Human dignityMilitary chaplaincyMoral injuryNATOPreventionStrategic

Identifiers

PMID42313353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.